The problem with estimating AGV fleet size

When planning a new warehouse or upgrading an existing one, the question of how many automated guided vehicles (AGVs) you need is critical — and almost always answered wrong the first time.

Rule-of-thumb calculations, vendor proposals, and spreadsheet models all miss the same thing: the interactions between vehicles. A single AGV blocked at a charging station, or two vehicles contending for the same aisle, can cascade into throughput failures that no static calculation can predict.

The result is over-buying to be safe — paying for vehicles you don't need — or under-specifying and discovering the bottleneck only after go-live, when the cost of fixing it is ten times higher.

The fundamental issue: AGV fleet performance is non-linear. Adding a 10th vehicle to a fleet of 9 doesn't add 10% capacity — it may add 3%, or reduce throughput if the aisle becomes congested. Only simulation captures this.

How simulation answers the question

A Simio simulation model replicates your entire warehouse: the physical layout, the AGV route network, the ASRS system, the pick stations, the order logic, and the throughput targets. It then runs thousands of virtual hours of operation, capturing every vehicle interaction, queue, and failure mode.

This lets you test specific fleet configurations — say, 8, 10, and 12 AGVs at two different speeds — and see exactly how each performs against your throughput requirements, before any procurement decision is made.

1

Data collection & layout import

We work from your warehouse floor plan or CAD layout, AGV network, WMS order data, and ASRS specifications. Where data isn't available, we use validated industry benchmarks and scope assumptions transparently.

2

Simulation model build

We build the Simio model using the SimulateFirst logistics framework — pre-validated components for AGV navigation, ASRS bay logic, repacking stations, charging cycles, and traffic management.

3

Scenario testing

We run the configurations you specify — different fleet sizes, speeds, routing algorithms, and demand levels. Each scenario is run with multiple replications to account for variability and produce statistically robust results.

4

Results & recommendation

You receive a clear report: throughput by scenario, utilisation rates, queue analysis, bottleneck identification, and a specific recommendation for fleet size and configuration. The model is yours to keep.

What you get at the end

3–5
fleet configurations tested and compared with full data
±2%
statistical accuracy on throughput predictions across replications
100%
model ownership — use it for future planning or what-if analysis

Deliverables include: the Simio model file, a scenario comparison report with throughput curves and utilisation rates, a bottleneck analysis, and a written recommendation with the reasoning behind it. If you want to run future scenarios in-house, we offer Simio training as a follow-on.

Simulation vs conventional methods

CapabilitySimio simulation modelSpreadsheet / vendor estimate
Captures vehicle-to-vehicle interactions✓ Full traffic and contention modelling✗ Assumes independent operation
Accounts for charging cycles✓ Modelled per vehicle type and schedule✗ Usually omitted or simplified
Tests multiple demand scenarios✓ Peak, off-peak, seasonal variation✗ Single throughput target
Identifies specific bottlenecks✓ Queue analysis at every node✗ Not visible until go-live
Statistically robust results✓ Multiple replications, confidence intervalsApproximate only
ASRS coordination modelled✓ Full bay and crane interaction✗ Treated as infinite throughput

What data do we need?

You don't need a perfect dataset to start. We work with what's available and scope assumptions transparently:

  • Floor plan or CAD layout — even a rough schematic is enough to start
  • Order volume and pick rates — from WMS exports, historical data, or design targets
  • AGV specifications — speed, payload, charging time (vendor sheets are fine)
  • ASRS parameters — number of bays, crane speed, retrieval cycle time if applicable
  • Throughput targets — orders per hour, pallets per shift, SLA requirements
Automated pallet warehouse shuttle lift coordination Visual Components
Visual Components model — automated pallet warehouse with shuttle & lift coordination and WMS integration.

Tools & technology

Our AGV optimization work is built on Simio — the industry-leading discrete-event and agent-based simulation platform, used by logistics engineers and system integrators worldwide. We're a member of the Simio German Group and have built a proprietary AGV framework on top of Simio that dramatically reduces model build time without sacrificing fidelity.

Simio SimulateFirst AGV Framework IBM Optimization ASRS modelling

For complex multi-objective routing problems — where you need to optimize AGV scheduling against competing constraints simultaneously — we also use IBM's optimization engine alongside Simio to find provably optimal routing policies.

Mixed fleet — AGVs, AMRs, and forklifts together

When the facility has multiple vehicle types, sizing each one separately is the most common — and most expensive — mistake. An AGV on a fixed route blocks an AMR that needs to reroute. A forklift taking a wide turn at the loading dock creates a recurring queue for AGVs waiting to charge. None of this appears in single-vehicle calculations.

Fixed-path automation

AGV

Follows predefined routes — magnetic tape, QR codes, or wire. The simulation models traffic contention on fixed paths, charging cycles, and intersection priority rules.

Dynamic navigation

AMR

Navigates freely using SLAM — no fixed paths, reroutes around obstacles in real time. The simulation models fleet coordination via the traffic management system and zone reservations.

Manual / semi-automated

Forklift

The unpredictable agents in any intralogistics model. Variable speed, unplanned stops, and operator behaviour patterns all affect how much space automated vehicles have. A model without forklifts will overestimate automated throughput.

We model all vehicle types simultaneously in the same Simio environment — each following its own logic, sharing aisles and charging infrastructure. This lets you answer questions like: does switching from 12 AGVs to 8 AMRs maintain throughput? Can the forklift shift pattern change without creating an ASRS queue?

Related examples

See it in practice

AGV ASRS warehouse optimization simulation

AGV fleet optimisation — fleet size, speed & working hours impact on throughput

Simio · Logistics
Assembly line AGV coordination simulation

Manufacturing line — AGV coordination with assembly cells

Simio · Manufacturing
Large warehouse forklift fleet sizing simulation

Large warehouse — forklift fleet sizing across receiving, picking & storage

Simio · Logistics
Case study

Scalable e-commerce warehouse:
28% fewer AGVs than the initial plan

Large warehouse forklift fleet sizing Simio simulation
Logistics · Simio

E-commerce warehouse — AGV fleet sizing with ASRS integration

A logistics operator was planning a new scalable warehouse with an automated storage and retrieval system (ASRS) served by a fleet of automated guided vehicles. Their initial estimate called for 14 AGVs based on cycle time calculations from the ASRS vendor.

SimulateFirst built a full Simio simulation of the warehouse layout, AGV routing network, repacking stations, and ASRS bay logic. Three fleet configurations were tested — 8, 10, and 12 vehicles — each at two different speed settings, using peak and average order volume data from the client's WMS.

10 AGVs met the throughput target at optimal speed — not 14
28% reduction in fleet size, saving significant capex
Two specific bottleneck points identified and resolved in the layout
Model handed over for ongoing use as the warehouse scales
View all examples →
AI-assisted modelling

Start your AGV study before the layout exists

The most common reason AGV simulation studies are delayed is missing data: a new facility doesn't have measured travel distances, and forklift interaction logs don't exist for a route network that hasn't been built yet. AI changes this.

We use AI to generate synthetic travel time distributions for AGV and forklift routes from layout geometry and vehicle specifications — triangular distributions calibrated against industry benchmarks for acceleration profiles, intersection delays, and load-dependent speed. These let the simulation run and produce useful early results while real measurements are collected in parallel.

For concept-phase layout comparisons — where the question is which of three floor plan options needs the fewest vehicles — AI-generated scenario data is accurate enough to rank configurations reliably, even before any physical facility exists.

Read the full AI & simulation guide →
AI applies to this service
  • Synthetic AGV route distance matrices from CAD/floor plan
  • Travel time distributions for forklifts and mixed fleets
  • Scenario batch scripts — 100s of runs overnight, results by morning
  • Layout alternative ranking before real data is available

Synthetic data is replaced with measured values before any final recommendation. AI accelerates the start — engineering expertise validates the end.

FAQ

Common questions about
AGV simulation

The optimal number depends on your order volume, pick rates, aisle layout, ASRS configuration, and throughput targets. Simulation models each of these factors together — including vehicle interactions and traffic — to identify the exact fleet size that meets your targets without over-investment. Typical results show 20–35% fewer vehicles than initial rule-of-thumb estimates.
Most AGV sizing projects run 2–4 weeks from kick-off to final results. We scope the exact timeline in the proposal phase, before any commitment.
We typically need: warehouse floor plan or CAD layout, AGV route network or aisle configuration, order volumes and pick rates (from WMS or historical data), ASRS specifications if applicable, and throughput targets or SLA requirements. We can work with estimates where exact data isn't available, and we scope all assumptions transparently.
Yes — we model AGV behaviour from the specifications: speed, acceleration, turning radius, charging time, payload capacity. We don't require a vendor-specific plugin; the physics are parameterised directly in Simio. We can also model mixed fleets where different vehicle types operate in the same environment.
That's actually the ideal time to run the simulation — when the layout can still be changed. We can test multiple layout options in parallel and identify which configuration minimises AGV count and maximises throughput. Simulation findings often directly influence the final layout design.
Yes. The Simio model is handed over to you with full documentation. You can use it to test future scenarios — new order volumes, additional AGVs as you scale, new ASRS bays, or layout changes. If you want to run it in-house, we offer Simio training courses. Many clients use the model for years after the initial project.
Free consultation

Let's size your AGV fleet correctly

Tell us about your warehouse — layout, order volumes, ASRS configuration, throughput targets. We'll tell you honestly what simulation can answer and how long it takes.

Response within 1 business day
Full NDA available as standard
Remote delivery worldwide
Transparent fixed-scope proposal

Germany — Dresden

Anton-Graff-Str. 24, D-01309
dresden@simulatefirst.com
+49 (0) 351 30906020

Poland — Wrocław

ul. Powstańców Śląskich 5, 53-332
polska@simulatefirst.com
+48 75 6406434

We respond within 1 business day · NDA available · No spam, ever

By submitting, your data will be used solely to respond to your enquiry. Privacy policy.